Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Laurie Lotus's avatar

I “enjoyed” reading this. Maybe “appreciated” reading this is a better description. Transgender issues are not something I am very familiar with nor something I choose to focus on —not because I am against transgender people but because it makes me a bit uncomfortable and there are SO many other issues that pull for my attention. Misogyny and women’s rights I am more passionate about along with the environment, for instance.

I did read your post though and I want you to know that it made me a bit less uncomfortable and a bit more curious and empathetic towards the whole trans thing. Thank you for speaking out and sharing your thoughts.

Expand full comment
Wild Lion*esses Pride from Jay's avatar

Danielle, I appreciate the clarity and refusal to let propaganda go unchallenged. The executive order is not about protecting women—it’s about control. The language mirrors the same fear-mongering tactics used throughout history to justify oppression, and the fact that it comes from a man found liable for sexual abuse only makes the hypocrisy more glaring.

The real threat to women has always been men. The statistics make that clear. Yet instead of addressing intimate partner violence, harassment, or the erosion of reproductive rights, this administration is fixated on dehumanizing transgender people. Not because they pose a threat, but because fascism thrives on division—on manufacturing an "us" and a "them."

There’s nothing new about this. But that doesn’t mean it can be ignored. Empathy takes effort. So does critical thinking. And both are needed now more than ever.

Expand full comment
32 more comments...

No posts